Saba withdraws second requisition at CQS Natural Resources Growth & Income
Allowing the CQS Natural Resources board to complete a strategic review
Allowing the CQS Natural Resources board to complete a strategic review
|
|
Its nominee company did not hold sufficient shares at the time of the requisition notice
|
|
Requisition notice has been withdrawn for 60 days after “constructive discussions” between Saba and the investment trust’s board
|
|
It wants to create an open-ended version of the trust, despite the board already undergoing a strategic review
|
|
Activist investor aims to convert each trust into an open-ended vehicle to provide the option of liquidity at NAV
|
|
Saba Capital has so far failed to convince shareholders, receiving less than 2% of independent voting at each meeting
|
|
Non-Saba shareholders almost unanimously voted against the proposals at each investment trust
|
|
Amendments to company law would require platforms to opt in investors automatically to receive company information and voting rights
|
|
Outside of Saba’s shares, only 0.15% of the votes cast were in favour of Saba’s proposals to replace the trust’s board
|
|
Trusts managed by BlackRock have been assured by Saba that it would not oust and replace their boards
|
|
Results ahead of vote to remove current board at the encouragement of Saba Capital
|
|
Saba CEO confirmed the hedge fund would seek to merge trusts into a single vehicle and invest back into UK assets
|
|