Volatility splits fund buyers

Professional fund buyers are split on whether volatility represents a threat or an opportunity for portfolios.

Polar and Man defy volatile quarter with AUM growth
4 minutes

Almost eight in ten (78%) professional fund buyers said they have been surprised that volatility had remained so low for so long and nearly half of them (49%) cited asset price volatility spikes as one of their top concerns for 2018.

However, they are split on the impact volatility has on their portfolios, with 39% who see increasing volatility as a threat, while 38% anticipate a positive effect on portfolio performance.

Among the other main findings of the study: professional fund buyers are turning to active management and as 78% of individual investors worldwide want their investments to align with their personal values, professionals are starting to see as much alpha benefit as risk management in ESG investments.

Natixis Investment Managers surveyed 200 professional fund buyers responsible for selecting funds included on private bank, insurance, fund of funds, and other retail platforms.

Matthew Shafer, head of global wholesale at ‎Natixis Investment Managers said: “The split in opinion over the impact volatility will have can be interpreted in two ways. The downside opinion is likely built on the view that after a long period of steady growth, we are due for a correction that will bring security prices back down to earth.

“However, on the upside, increasing volatility could signal higher return dispersions and greater potential to generate alpha. Interestingly, whatever the interpretation may be, overall professional fund buyers are turning to active management to diversify their portfolios, mitigate risk and enhance return”.

Evolving portfolio strategies

They may be split over the impact of volatility on portfolios but more than eight in ten (82%) of professional fund buyers are confident that their average return target of 8.4% in 2018 is realistically achievable, as they evolve investment strategies to meet the new market reality.

The most popular strategies for managing risk include diversifying by sector (91%), risk budgeting (80%) and increasing the use of alternatives (75%), among the professional investor community.

Two in five portfolio professionals (42%) say they will manage duration to mitigate principal losses in bond portfolios. However, three in five (62%) say that fixed income no longer provides its traditional risk management role, with 20% increasing the use of alternative investments and 18% reducing fixed income exposure overall.

Shafer said: “The survey results suggest that professional fund buyers are more likely to make directional shifts in where they invest, rather than wholesale allocation changes. In fixed income they will look to shorten duration on bonds and implement alternatives to enhance income.

“In equities we’re seeing a preference for European and emerging market stocks. With alternative investments, they turn to private equity to generate alpha and manage volatility with hedged equity and managed futures. They see the long-term value that can be generated by active management and they implement it through a broad range of strategies.”

Implementing alternative investments

Professional fund buyers are increasingly looking to diversify portfolio risk and 70% believe it is essential to invest in alternatives to do so.

More than three in five (65%) believe that traditional asset classes are too closely correlated to provide distinctive sources of return

A range of alternatives can help with broader portfolio diversification, with 52% highlighting managed futures, almost half (47%) commodities, 44% global macro, 43% infrastructure and 38% private equity.

In anticipation of increased volatility, half (51%) of those surveyed see the potential of hedged equity strategies to absorb market shocks while 36% say managed futures are well suited to an increasing volatile market environment

However, alternatives are not only being employed to help diversify portfolios. Over a third of professional fund buyers see alternative investments as an effective strategy for generating alpha:

Almost three in five (58%) report that their organization is increasingly using alternatives as a replacement for fixed income, with a clear preference for real estate (52%) to generate income

Four in ten believe infrastructure is well suited to addressing income objectives, while more than a third (35%) see private debt as an effective income generation vehicle

Over half (58%) identified private equity as an effective strategy to generate stronger returns, with a third (31%) also highlighting private debt

“Professional fund buyers are facing a range of portfolio objectives that are made challenging by the current market environment. Whether they’re looking to generate income in a low yield environment, obtain alpha while correlations are high, minimize the effects of volatility or enhance overall diversification, professional investors favour active management and expand their capabilities with alternative investments,” said Shafer.

MORE ARTICLES ON