Is there any point investing in the US actively?
Active funds don’t come close to the high returns of the index trackers, with many multi-asset managers cutting their active exposure all together
Active funds don’t come close to the high returns of the index trackers, with many multi-asset managers cutting their active exposure all together
|
|
Only 35% of active funds beat their benchmark over the past 12 months, and ESG portfolios were even worse off
|
|
Elston Consulting fund selector Jackie Qiao discusses how she sees active funds evolving over the next decade
|
|
£1bn pulled from funds in June, including a net £858m from UK equities
|
|
Fund tracks Societe Generale’s SGI European Green Deal index
|
|
Fundsmith Equity was the only active fund in the top 10 list
|
|
It could represent a ‘low-cost starting point for a portfolio aiming to deliver long-term growth in a responsible way’
|
|
Highlighting how expensive it was in the first place may not have helped
|
|
Changes unlikely to be forthcoming until at least Q2
|
|
Virgin charges investors 1% for a tracker fund that fell more than 10% in 2018
|
|
Some sustainable index trackers have outperformed their plain vanilla peers since they were established a few years ago, while others haven’t.
|
|
Boutique multi-manager IBOSS AM has dramatically cut its portfolios’ exposure to active managers, reducing its OCFs in the process.
|
|