Sigh of relief as government plans to scrap problematic Priips Kids
Overly optimistic scenarios in the key information documents risk misleading investors
Overly optimistic scenarios in the key information documents risk misleading investors
|
|
Investment trade body argues use of the Priips documents should be suspended
|
|
‘Investment companies are still at a disadvantage in having to produce these toxic disclosures’
|
|
Mulls dropping performance scenarios to reduce ‘potentially misleading information being displayed’
|
|
European Commission clashes with Esma over forward-looking performance assessments
|
|
The key events for UK wealth managers for the week starting 18 February
|
|
European Supervisory Authorities’ timeline is too ambitious
|
|
Key information document is not meeting its objectives
|
|
Fund selectors could be forced to disregard information in the Priip Kids when choosing funds
|
|
Some funds have disclosed negative or zero transaction costs under the new framework
|
|
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has found significant calculation errors in transaction costs for firms reporting under Priips and Mifid II.
|
|
Priips was intended to improve investors’ ability to compare investments, but tax-advantaged products highlight some of the confusion it has created in the process, according to MJ Hudson Allenbridge vice president Rotimi Ososami.
|
|