AJ Bell: Passive funds ‘eating the lunch’ of active managers
Just a third of active funds outperform passive across a decade
Just a third of active funds outperform passive across a decade
|
|
How did these 20 active funds succeed where so many others failed?
|
|
Active funds lose £2.1bn, according to IA
|
|
Funds that converted to ESG strategies lowered their costs by 20 basis points on average
|
|
Iain McLeod examines the key trends driving the world’s wealthiest investors’ portfolios
|
|
Domination of mega caps has ‘never continued indefinitely’
|
|
St James’s Place portfolio strategies manager shares what led her to a career in the investment sector
|
|
Active funds may have lost some of their shine, but a blended portfolio is essential to any investor, writes Sefian Kasem
|
|
Tracker funds are seen as the low-risk route to investing, but Felix Wintle says this assumption may need a re-think
|
|
Only 35% of active funds beat their benchmark over the past 12 months, and ESG portfolios were even worse off
|
|
According to Morningstar’s latest Active/Passive Barometer report
|
|
Funds that outperform hold lower average fee than underperformers, according to the platform
|
|