Frontier market funds lead the emerging pack

Frontier market funds are leading Europe’s emerging market fund pack with Charlemagne’s frontier market offering at the top, according to FE Analytics.

Why new Temit manager is sticking with IT

Data from FE Analytics showed the Charlemagne Magna New Frontiers Fund returned a cumulative 130.89% for the five years to 16 January.

This was followed by Schroder’s ISF Frontier Markets Equity C Fund at 93.06%, the Schroder ISF Emerging Asia Z Fund at 90.06%, Fidelity’s Emerging Asia W Fund at 81.04%, and the Allianz Emerging Asia Equity A Fund at 75.74% for the same period.

Looking at the Charlemagne fund’s region weightings, the fund allocated 29.83% to the Middle East/Africa, 19.69% to Europe ex UK, 18.80% to the Americas, and 16.31% to the pacific basin. Its largest sector weighting went to financials at 32.3%, followed by consumer products at 18.8% and basic materials at 12%.

Frontier markets

Latest data from Portfolio Adviser‘s sister title Expert Investor’s research team, suggests that sentiment from European fund selectors was remarkably positive for the frontier market asset class, especially from Nordic countries.

According to investment manager Ashmore’s latest emerging market outlook, frontier markets remained a compelling strategic case and should continue to attract investors looking to diversify their global portfolios this year.

The firm found the frontier markets sector returned 31.8% in 2017 thanks to improvements in earnings growth and earnings expectations.

“However, significantly, the earnings recovery is only just starting in frontier markets. Moreover, frontier valuations are reasonably attractive trading in line with emerging and at a discount to developed markets,” the outlook said.

“The MSCI Frontier Markets index is trading around 12x price-to-earnings ratios.”

Speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday, Ashmore’s head of frontier markets, Andrew Brudenell said there were a lot of misperceptions about frontier markets.

“Frontier markets are just smaller emerging market countries that haven’t really pushed the button on accelerating reform and change which is good and bad news. The bad news is that they haven’t done it but the good news is that they have the capability to do it,” he said.

“They either decide to have more clarity in terms of regulation and legal structure and more stable political environment, perhaps a separation of army and politics, and judiciary versus politicians to create confidence domestically and eventually overseas to try and create an environment conducive to investment and growth.”

Brudenell said it was about relative change and that it was about looking at what path the countries were trying to get to as opposed to them looking like the US or Europe anytime soon.

Article continues on the next page…

Tags: | | |

Related Content

Leave a Reply