The peso fell more than 20% against the dollar after rank outsider Alberto Fernández won a surprise 47% of the vote in Sunday’s primary election against incumbent Mauricio Macri, who received less than 33%.
Yields on Argentinian government bonds maturing in 2021 spiked to about 38% on Monday, while the yield hit almost 15% for those maturing in 2028. Argentina’s Merval equity index fell 37% in dollar terms.
Investors subsequently fled Argentine assets in their droves and six of Hasenstab’s (pictured) funds with the most significant exposure to the country suffered ‘paper losses’ totalling $1.8bn, according to calculations by the Financial Times based on AUM and portfolio weightings as of 31 July.
The $11.3bn Templeton Emerging Markets Bond fund has 10.46% exposure to Argentina, according to its factsheet. The FT calculated the fund fell 3.5%, or $400m, on Monday.
Meanwhile, the $17.4bn Templeton Global Total Return fund, which has 6.36% exposure to Argentina, lost $440m and the $33.1bn Templeton Global Bond fund, which has a 3.35% exposure to the South American country, lost $592m.
Three other funds run by Hasenstab lost about $362m in total, the FT said.
Chelsea Financial Services managing director Darius McDermott said the loss is a huge number “when painted in pounds, shillings and pence”, but most emerging market debt funds would have been hit. The question, he added, should be what percentage the losses make up of Hasenstab’s overall assets under management.
He said: “A lot of emerging market bond funds will have lost money if they had exposure to Argentina. Historically, Hasenstab has tended to be quite volatile and will go sometimes where others don’t have the risk appetite and that has historically led to chunks of volatility.
“So yes, of course it is a huge number. My question is what percentage did he lose; were they the worst performing bond funds in their sector?”
According to FE, the Templeton Emerging Markers Bond fund is fourth quartile over all periods, returning investors -0.6%, 5% and 1.5% in sterling terms over one, three and five years respectively. This compares with 15.1%, 14.3% and 35.9% for the IA Global Emerging Markets Bond sector over the same period.
The Luxembourg domiciled Templeton Global Total Return fund has returned 18.3% and 40% in US dollar terms over three and five years respectively versus the FO Fixed Int – Global sector’s 14.3% and 41.4%.
Franklin Templeton declined to comment.